Angie's Advice: Space
Over the past few decades, our nation has spent billions of dollars on the space program. Okay, so putting a man on the moon was pretty cool. And I wouldn’t want to even think about life without velcro. But what other contributions has NASA made to society? Is the cost worth it?
Sincerely,
Not So Starry-Eyed
Dear Starry,
Many people aren’t aware of the numerous benefits of a vibrant space program. Including me--so if you’ve heard of any, let me know.
Just kidding, space fans! There are lots of benefits--lots! For example, you have NASA to thank for these:
1. Freeze-dried ice cream (available in chocolate, vanilla, and the ever-popular Neapolitan)
2. The term “A-OK”
3. The hit movie Apollo 13, starring Tom Hanks
4. Jokes about wacky mix-ups involving the metric system and lost Mars-bound spacecrafts
5. Hmm, let’s see…
Wait, here we go. From thespaceplace.com:
6. Enriched baby food. These aren’t your grandmother’s mashed-with-a-fork style bananas. No, these are mashed-up bananas that cost much, much more.
7. Ribbed swimsuit. Move over Land’s End--somebody else is moving into the quality swimwear market! A great choice for those who burn easily, since every square inch of skin is entombed in a thick thermal-protective garment. Matching oxygen tank also available.
8. Wedding Sensor System. While I can’t imagine what the application might be for this technology, I’m sure brides everywhere will want to add it to their gift registries and…hold on a minute. My mistake. That should be Welding Sensor System. Well, what the heck, brides--go ahead and register for one of these, too!
And if that isn’t enough, here’s the granddaddy of benefits:
9. The three-dimensional semiconductor cubing package. Bet you didn’t know you had NASA to thank for that one.
I think you’ll agree, Starry, that the billions of dollars you mentioned is money well spent. So open up that velcro-sealed wallet of yours, pay those taxes, and be assured that everything is A-OK!
------
Dear Angie,
The other day someone asked me whether I rigidly held to Hubble’s law of redshift in determining vast galactic distances, or whether I considered the photon half-life as a possible explanation for wavelength anomalies.
Sure, there was a time I would have felt passionately about this issue, but I just don’t know anymore. What should my answer have been?
Sincerely,
Spaced Out
Dear Spaced,
Before I respond to your question, let me first express my surprise. Perhaps you weren’t aware that it’s your duty as American to have an opinion on everything--and to express it using slogans, taunts, and oversimplification of the opposing view. So, in light of this (no pun intended!), here is my position on the matter (sorry!)
First, let me suggest a slogan: “Red Star, Very Far.”
You’ll notice that while it has very little to do with the actual content of the debate, it does rhyme.
Here’s one that introduces the element of mockery, essential in any debate: “Half-Lifer, Half-Wit!”
And, finally, a slogan that lends itself nicely to being chanted by angry astrophsicists: “Hey, hey, ho, ho, Hubble’s strict interpretation of cosmological redshift’s got to go!”
Well, there you have it. And to you scientists who object to the flippant trajectory I’ve taken with this issue, I apologize. In the future, I’ll try to treat the subject of cosmology with more gravity.
Labels: spoof_advice


![RSS feed [RSS feed]](http://angiebrennan.com/images/rss_feed.gif)
![XML feed [Valid Atom 0.3]](http://www.angiebrennan.com/images/xml_logo.gif)

